A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
迪士尼的ip宇宙，除了感慨一下版权众多就没别的体验了。
略失望。。。以为是个心理惊悚，结果结尾是真超自然事件，还有俩女主和解是什么鬼？以及那些Jump scare，纯粹为吓人而吓人，没什么意义
真的很有意思啊！好期待迪士尼以后的优秀作品！！！！！
美术，色彩，镜头，音乐依旧很棒，前后不同的画风也很出色，但这也是全部优点了，故事越往后越不好看，而且埃德加·赖特个人风格没那么明显，略失望。泰勒-乔伊是真不好看，麦肯齐更好看。6分。
比库伊拉看似层次多，但显然整个的想法完全乱套。凶宅设定得毫无道理，对传统年代暧昧的向往与“理所当然的性剥削”的反抗都让它最后只能缩回一个个人成长噩梦的话语里。Sandie 是什么呢，是被剥削和侵害的女性，是女主人公共情甚至两位一体的女性，却在现实中成为了整个故事的最大反派，这让为性剥削女性的代言（女主最后拒绝死灵杀死Sandie 为他们复仇的请求）和Sandie 对女主的原谅甚至祝福都显得非常硬拗。一个《穆赫兰道》母体混杂《惊魂记》视听的奇怪缝合怪，最后楼梯戏真的连表演都崩了，格局小成这样，太失望。
世界观和兔子罗杰相似，故事则较为简单，整体娱乐性不错，不只局限于迪士尼的各大厂牌角色客串也很有趣，没想到丑索尼克在这里又焕发了第二春，看过迪士尼那么多经典动画的真人版化，来一部这种非重拍思路的也挺好，做为网络电影完全足够了。
其实从《极盗车神》开始，埃德加·赖特逐渐变得没有个性了，而且总是塞满音乐来带情绪，本片前半段女大学生支身来到陌生城市入学的剧情还挺《阴风阵阵》的，整个色调和气氛布置也是铅黄风格，没想到后半段急转直下，受害者变成施暴者，女学生神经兮兮，本身要讲的女性议题也沦为了连环杀人案这种俗套收场，而且两个女性角色既然都玩儿了附身这种身份重叠戏，最后竟然也不是同一战线，属实无意义。
其实以类型片的标准来看，制作水准也够得上3、4星了，可是眼看着导演的浅陋，是如此地消解了本来可以很精彩的一场对于时代的缅怀，浪费了对于现实思考的机会，辜负了即便是本片中也存在的不少机巧的小细节，特别是令1960年代《复仇者》的女神Diana Rigg作如此的谢幕，不得不扣分啊。
乡下姑娘来求学，押二付二住洞穴。半夜助眠听音乐，庄生晓梦迷蝴蝶。跟着大姐混酒吧，天天都过清明节。男人都是坏东西，老娘才是真豪杰。
【丽江🚄昆明】天马行空和灵光一闪的创意怀旧梗真的好好好好，但是剧本故事敢不敢再烂一点啊！典型的有佳句无佳章，可是本人又没出息的被这种共生关系打动了，fine，这又是和卓一起在动车上看的，给你多加一颗星！
女角色们失心疯了，即刻杖毙！好莱坞或许这些年根本就拍不出能看的恐怖片。这剧本看得人心绞痛。
对导演期待其实特别高，立意很高但是表现手法是不是有点太实在了？无论是乡村女孩儿逐梦伦敦时尚圈，还是男性凝视像僵尸一样穿越时代。僵尸和跳吓不断出现，看得我想打人了。导演不知道这两年恐怖片这样搞已经是很低级的了么。最后的反转又是什么鬼。虽然都可以解释通，但是就是觉得远远低于期待啊！
强烈的影像风格，像是一场大型的MV，一场梦幻迷离的梦
Soho见鬼，冷血惊魂，镜像奇观，女性自救，但落于一个比较无聊的结局，复古感没有从头做到尾，CG某些地方还有点假。Thomasin McKenzie好多时候看着都特别像Abigail Breslin……
网大电影，前半部分尚有逐步引入的类型节奏，后半部分如同《前程似锦的女孩》般粗暴混乱，最后的僵尸乱斗简直低智得想哭
有一瞬从配乐里感到了次元壁被穿透，有如通电一般的快感。
仿今敏式视听，仿《灵魂狂欢节》&《冷血惊魂》式复古，呈现出一个空洞的三流文本。早料到黛安·里格不会是一个普通房东老太太如此简单。只是以为特伦斯·斯坦普是位智者或世外高人，结果是一障眼法。
我还以为是致敬(我最爱的)60s，结果更炫酷。现实生活中，数不尽的理想主义女孩兴奋的入读art school，结果现实残酷性格太敏感无法handle reality, then they go insane eventually. It’s quite common and sad.
埃德加赖特的视听水准还算是在的，就是故事讲得稀烂，到最后也没明白60年代和现在是什么关系，主角看到的过去与她所处的当下又是什么关系...
原来三次元和二次元结合的世界是这样的，加上各种梗，轻松有趣，还看到了同款奇奇蒂蒂玉米杯！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
