-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Umberto Lenzi is undoubtedly the king of Italian crime movies, but unfortunately; Syndicate Sadists is not the best examples of his work in this genre. Lenzi's crime flicks tend to be a cut above the rest because he makes films based on stories with a point, and they don't lack direction; but this film feels a bit too wayward to fully fit with the rest of his stuff. The film takes obvious influence from Sergio Leone's landmark western 'A Fistful of Dollars' (which in turn, took influence from Akira Kurosawa's landmark samurai flick Yojimbo), in that it features two warring families and a strong character at the centre. The crime that Lenzi focuses on is kidnapping, and we centre on a character called 'Rambo'. Rambo is dragged into the war between the two families after his brother is killed because of it. Rambo uses his brains and brawn to pit the two families against one another, in the hope of gaining revenge for his brother's death, rescuing a young boy that they've kidnapped, and ultimately letting the two sides destroy one another.
The film's biggest asset is undoubtedly Tomas Milian. Milian was put to great use by Lenzi in almost all of his crime thrillers. The range of characters he has played for Lenzi is immense, and this one is easily one of the coolest. The character is called Rambo, which immediately sprang to mind the popular Sylvester Stallone character - but for once, the Italians actually haven't stolen this name as Syndicate Sadists was released first! As usual, the film is wickedly entertaining, as we get to watch Milian get himself involved in the usual array of car chases, shootouts and brawls. Lenzi has got him riding a motorbike this time round, and every scene featuring it and Milian is a real standout! However, the film often feels like it doesn't really have anywhere to go, and this means that the running time is stretched out more than it should be. Compared to the crime films of other Italian directors, Syndicate Sadists is more than above average; but in relation to Lenzi crime flicks such as Almost Human and The Cynic, The Rat and The Fist - it doesn't stand tall as one of Lenzi's best. Still, if you're looking for ninety minutes of testosterone fuelled mayhem - Syndicate Sadists will suffice!
600多年前和现在，并无两样，从来不缺觉醒者，不缺“伪君子”，不缺默默隐忍者…有了互联网，大家变成“键盘骑士”，在线上“决斗”，无关生死，一场输了，换个评论区，继续…
在未来，如果有这样一个克隆体，它和你长得一模一样，拥有你完整的DNA以及所有的记忆，那么，你能接受它吗？又或者，你能接受你的另一半是这样一个克隆体吗？
14世纪的一桩强奸案，超强的卡司，三个视角的叙事，最后扣人心弦的决斗。有时想，不知同样的故事发生在古代中国会怎么样，大概其不会有决斗，也许女主会自尽，或者是男主一怒杀了奸夫。几个主演的表演都很棒，影片色调也很有味道，明显调成了暗色，尽量去除了彩色的鲜艳感，让人看去有古旧的味道。
最后的生死斗好看！现在最后一口气没上来的电影太多了，高潮戏货真价实的难能可贵
我才反应过来
中世纪细节还原一百分，用三方视角还原真相的罗生门式叙事其实无甚新意，但细微的差异和调度剪辑上的设计仍然耐人寻味。总而言之，女人实苦，一直都是。
70/100 若不是雷导镜头下历史片的特有质感，罗生门式的N（N=3）段叙事很难看得下去，事情的原委在每段中纯粹是以单人客观的视角而存在，它忽视了讲述者的主观性，在呈现上仅是将故事以段落式的切割，如果主创的意图仅限于此，那完全没必要耗费如此冗长的篇幅。好在罗生门结束后的中世纪对决拍的足够有猛劲，大饱眼福。
一部好的电影就是随着情节的发展，观众在不知不觉间随着主人公流泪了，自然到无所感知。在电影的结尾，看着Cameron和儿子告别，看着妻子的深情表白，我跟着Cameron的哭泣而情不自禁的流泪。如果复制一个自己，可以减少自己离去而对家人造成的悲恸，你会愿意复制一个自己吗？有一处重要台词我认为翻译错误 Cameron对妻子内疚时说"I drifted." 应该是 我疏远你了的意思，翻译成“我出过轨。”实在是大错特错，出轨应该是 "I cheated." 这是个不应该的错误。
类似克隆题材已经很多了，与过往不同的是，故事的内容更新出了相对无害的理想结果，组合了“身体克隆和思维上载”两个重点为一体，合成出相对完美的生命延续体。 始终相信不久的未来，这样的选择将成为必将面对的现实。 如果可以这样完美的交接，何尝不是种选择。 但其他影片中也曾阐述了另一个问题～阶层始终存在，技术不是问题的时候，如此美好的身后故事，要用什么物质代价来付费呢。
Cameron流着眼泪微笑
狗子能看到又不是有鬼
虽然是六百多年前的事情，但被侵害的女性所遭受的各种痛苦和折磨仍然在现代上演。罗生门式的故事结构不会掩饰，反而更加衬托了两位男主的残忍、傲慢和虚伪。
只是希望，因为快绝望
三個視角來論述同一件事，但三個視角幾乎沒有任何差別，感覺就是一段素材用了三遍。在 Me Too 運動浪潮持續在全球延燒的今天，這個文本對這個議題和女性的刻劃依舊非常表面，對瑪格麗特的勇敢和痛苦都非常非常的敷衍⋯⋯也不只是女性角色，所有的角色全都是只打了個草稿就拿出去拍的感覺。可惜了一個那麼好的故事了。
太像apple tv能做出来的戏了，我的妈呀。把市侩老梗讲出性冷淡风可能也是现在的流行趋势吧。
以另外一个存在代替自己去爱所爱之人，
2.5。结构性闪回叙事在这部片子里起到的立场强化作用被最后一章“真相”中决斗的悲怆感消解得所剩无几。要不是结尾赫然打出“尚德卡鲁日数年后在十字军东征战死”的字幕略带暗讽意味的找补一下，就连现行立场的正确性也都不是那么让人笃信了。
记得梁雪村在谈日韩矛盾的时候讲到，韩国之所以在慰安妇问题上死死抓住不放，并不是因为这段历史伤害了韩国的女性，而是因为这段历史伤害了韩国的男性。“如果你们真的那么在意女性的痛苦，现在就应该平等地尊重女性。” （想一想为什么“cnm”比“f**k you”的侮辱性更大）
越长大越多被迫面对病痛和死亡，越感受到造物之残酷。通向衰老的路径必然而不可逆，而这一切带来的只有悲伤。这必然发生且几乎百害而无一利的事，是写在我们基因里的宿命.....
40岁的阿明拿魔改竹林中拼命讲道理。雷老头一大把年纪却玩弄细节搞这种小幽默实属文人和宅宅的区别。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
