剧情介绍

  喜剧,讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人,周旋于女友和未来岳父之间,因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人,认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
  Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
  Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
  The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
  Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
  Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
  Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
  In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
  On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

评论:

  • 彤英华 1小时前 :

    安重返校园,重返那个在雨果诗句的带领下,优胜劣汰的校园。生育权,应该真正还给女性,而不是利用宗教、法律禁止堕胎。倘若安顺应社会规则,生下孩子。那么,这个孩子极大可能面临着单亲家庭,成长环境不能得到保证。安也因此失去通过上学实现阶层跨越的机会,极大可能留在出生的阶层、区域,重走父母走过的路。那么,这将是对两代人的沉重打击。生育,意味着责任。倘若不能给下一代提供更好的环境,不能给下一代留下更多的选择,那么下一代极大可能被迫重复你走过的路,你父母、爷奶辈走过的路。这样的人生,这样的生育,有何意义?

  • 佘蓉蓉 0小时前 :

    看此片时的背景:据BBC,美国最高法院(Supreme Court)于当地时间周五(6月24日)作出裁决,推翻近半个世纪前有关女性堕胎合宪权的“罗诉韦德案”(Roe v Wade),裁定女性堕胎并非宪法赋予的权利——这一决定可能立即导致堕胎行为在美国22个州属非法。

  • 帆静 9小时前 :

    “一种只会攻击女性的病,一种让他们变成家庭妇女的病。”

  • 振谷 2小时前 :

    挺喜欢的片。四比三的画幅、近中景手持跟拍以及有些做旧的滤镜,可能会使得法国人看这片的质感像是我们看第五代第六代拍八十年代的片,无形的结构压迫和逼仄简单的环境一道,把人困于一种铁笼般的生存境遇下。 新时代只是开了个头,还有很多尾巴没来得及被拖出水面。女性的历史必然以一阵阵身体的疼痛为起点呈现出来,那就必然有对历史本身的把握。和隔壁的《钛》一样,都从身体出发,比《钛》好的是,其现实主义质料的疼痛更能深入结构造成的心理应激疼痛,是历史的(法斯宾德式的),不是概念的(宣言式的)。

  • 况阳波 5小时前 :

    1. 虽然题材有点老套,但是导演把它拍得很痛、很真实,女性的无助和挣扎真的很令人心痛😭,但缺乏了解读的空间和深度

  • 彩杉 1小时前 :

    现在已经2022年,地球上的女性依然不能完全主宰自己的身体。一切都还在发生,正在发生。

  • 塞文墨 4小时前 :

    令人窒息,倔强的少女,这股劲儿用在哪不好...干净的法式画风

  • 岳帅灵凡 0小时前 :

    是不是为了呼应那个年代而采用了4:3画幅?故事情节流畅,很女性向的电影,女主蛮漂亮的

  • 伯颖秀 5小时前 :

    真的好无聊啊 后半段还可以 全片感觉非常陈腐 完全不像是和Titane同一年拍出来的片子

  • 承怀柔 0小时前 :

    4.5不难理解,想想片中的男人都做了什么,简单而深刻,片名具有意义。国外对题材探索的脚步已经甩我们好几条街,而我们还沉浸在虚构爱情或是挥舞励志正能量的大旗…

  • 励意智 0小时前 :

    @某些“少女”(知名不具),不如找心理咨询师“谈谈心”………@鸢鸢:看过!

  • 后斯雅 8小时前 :

    很精彩又沉痛的一部电影。有一些非常生々しい的镜头看得我嘶嘶乱叫(好疼啊真的)。拍得很沉稳踏实。这个世界比起60年前依然没有多少进步,女性依然没有解放自己身体的权利。行军仍在继续,旗帜圣洁,褴褛飞扬。

  • 勇念霜 0小时前 :

    用极惨烈的方式记录了女性堕胎的身心痛楚,破碎与迷惘。但无论是历史的纵深感还是镜头语言的克制美感都不如同样题材的《四月三周两天》,这个金狮奖也只能说是矮子里拔将军了。

  • 卫中成 4小时前 :

    1.片名影射的不错;2.传闻中吓昏影评人的场景让我无语,这影评人要是看了女性瘾者该会是什么反应?3.女主演技很不错,群像塑造的很模板化,每一幕我都可以预算到。4.堕胎题材希望某天有导演能拍出美国司法绕行下的故事,这才是“正发生” 而且也足够震撼

  • 卫伟 8小时前 :

    发现法国电影尺度是真大,说脱就脱。这类堕胎电影感觉都差不太多,不一样的就是当地的堕胎政策不一样,整体跟《总是 从不 有时》差不多吧。

  • 勤芳洲 9小时前 :

    被告知怀孕后的冷静,到图书馆查阅性书籍,花20法郎仿佛抓住救命稻草般所注射的雌二醇,一个人在房间幽暗的灯光下用烧灼后的细钢针直刺入下体,她没有足够的性常识、当面临着比地狱还糟糕的情况,她孤立无援,无法求助母亲、密友和那个让她怀孕的人。三次对身体的破坏,每一次都让痛感冲出银幕。我想到了《钛》,这个故事将背景设置在1960年代,年轻人对性的憧憬和欲望,女性对自身性吸引力的灌注,却让女性成为这一切没有错的原始欲望所造成的结果的全部承受者!更可怕的是畸形的法律、始终置身事外的精子提供者!那些身体上的疼痛,直到今天仍在书写。“正发生”

  • 刁文瑶 2小时前 :

    “一个人并非生下来就是女人,而是逐渐长成了女人”。

  • 凌格 6小时前 :

    影片内容基本围绕着女孩怀孕后的外界反应和堕胎过程,除了主角之外其他人物都十分扁平,主角也不够立体。相比同题材的《从不,很少》缺乏了饱满的人物,以及社会现状在故事中的投射,最主要缺乏了那种暧昧性表达,基本是把一切摊开在观众面前,没有给观众思考和反思的空间。

  • 丁俊风 9小时前 :

    很真实,很悲惨,一不留神的事,受伤害的只有女性。事后的惶恐日子,天天都是煎熬,冰冷的器具插入体内,生命随时终结,被羞辱地送往医院...。更应该给每个男孩看,一时的快乐,带给她人的伤害有多深。

  • 京嘉许 6小时前 :

    高高扬起头颅 高高举起旗帜

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved