Future of Food In the past year, we have seen food riots on three continents, food inflation has rocketed and experts predict that by 2050, if things don't change, we will see mass starvation across the world. This film sees George Alagiah travel the world in search of solutions to the growing global food crisis. From the two women working to make their Yorkshire market town self-sufficient to the academic who claims it could be better for the environment to ship in lamb from New Zealand, George Alagiah meets the people who believe they know how we should feed the world as demand doubles by the middle of the century.
【India】
George joins a Masai chief among the skeletons of hundreds of cattle he has lost to climate change and the English farmer who tells him why food production in the UK is also hit. He spends a day eating with a family in Cuba to find out how a future oil shock could lead to dramatic adjustments to diets. He visits the breadbasket of India to meet the farmer who now struggles to irrigate his land as water tables drop, and finds out why obesity is spiralling out of control in Mexico.
Back in Britain, George investigates what is wrong with people's diets, and discovers that the UK imports an average of 3000 litres of water per capita every day. He talks to top nutritionist Susan Jebb, DEFRA minister Hilary Benn and Nobel laureate Rajendra Pachauri to uncover what the future holds for our food.
【Senegal】
George heads out to India to discover how a changing diet in the developing world is putting pressure on the world's limited food resources. He finds out how using crops to produce fuel is impacting on food supplies across the continents. George then meets a farmer in Kent, who is struggling to sell his fruit at a profit, and a British farmer in Kenya who is shipping out tonnes of vegetables for our supermarket shelves. He also examines why so many people are still dying of hunger after decades of food aid.
Back in the UK, George challenges the decision-makers with the facts he has uncovered - from Oxfam head of research Duncan Green to Sainsbury's boss Justin King. He finds out why British beef may offer a model for future meat production and how our appetite for fish is stripping the world's seas bare.
【Cuba】
In the final episode George Alagiah heads out to Havana to find out how they are growing half of their fruit and vegetables right in the heart of the city, investigates the 'land-grabs' trend - where rich countries lease or buy up the land used by poor farmers in Africa - and meets the Indian agriculturalists who have almost trebled their yields over the course of a decade.
George finds out how we in this country are using cutting-edge science to extend the seasons recycle our food waste and even grow lettuce in fish tanks to guarantee the food on our plates.
He hears the arguments about genetically modified food and examines even more futuristic schemes to get the food on to our plates.
杀鸡焉用牛刀，是枝裕和翻拍是枝裕和，把日本《小偷家族》移植到韩国变成了一出温情的社会童话的《小偷家族》。拍来拍去还是是枝裕和，拍来拍去还是《小偷家族》。这种电影谁都可以拍，但不应该是是枝裕和。反结构式的母亲责任，自己送养孩子，自己活的烂，自己满目疮痍，自己下贱与不堪也成为了一种母亲的责任。而一车上的沦落人，是无组织目的性的结合，最后每个人都被温情盖了过去。虚假的又真实的造梦童话，真的很奇怪的是枝裕和可以在本土让《小偷家族》一家最后狼狈收场，也可以在法国絮絮叨叨家长里短，却把最温柔的童话给了韩国，蛮神奇的。宋康昊好尴尬的定位，完全没啥突出点，iu还行吧，摩天轮和姜东元可以的，用《我的大叔》的表演拍《我的解放日志》。
尼古拉斯凯奇的电影总感觉不看后悔，看了更后悔，但我依然一如既往的爱着他，期盼着他能崛起。
唯一让我在意的是…
Full of narcissistic cliché shit. But Paddington 2 is really good though.
已经降低预期了，没想到还是大失所望，无血缘组合照搬《小偷家族》，生而不养又是《无人知晓》，可是枝裕和的这种自我复制恰恰少了对社会尖锐的发问，每个人设都是善良无害的，警察线和掮客线都温吞得像是白开水，买卖孩子的行为毫无推动力，最后硬生生营造出孩子被众多人疼爱的温馨感，甚至还提出堕胎不比弃养道德的奇怪观点，就好像是那种鼓励生育或是宣扬宗教的宣传片，演员也没什么发挥空间，宋康昊凭这个夺影帝还真是水分很大，裴斗娜演这么个可有可无的角色也很可惜。
尼古拉斯凯奇演得尼古拉斯凯奇可真像尼古拉斯凯奇。
是枝裕和公式标准化流程作业。主旨仍着力于骨肉血亲的社会议题，欠缺以往作品刺骨的批判，注入更多直白的情天泪海。确实是天主教人道精神瞄得上的温情系。
3.5星，是枝裕和童话的又一次重复，但是韩国演员们给我的感觉就是要揭露阴谋了，直到最后都是温暖的，这太不韩了，别扭。
结局不太喜欢。其实在是枝裕和的电影里算不得好，但尽管如此仍然是好的。不同于以往韩影呈现的犯罪都市质感，导演把景和人都打碎重塑了，融入到他的宇宙里。我仍愿意跟随他的语言去相信人的良善，但我信不到结局那种地步。
对剧情、人物也越来越温柔，很难想象竟然在是枝裕和的电影里看到了美好的结局。算了其实是枝裕和也不是很想去溯源社会问题，不想去探讨母亲会选择堕胎还是生下孩子，生下孩子之后又为何会抛弃孩子，虽然吧也说出了“爸爸究竟在哪儿”的台词，其实批判力度还是欠缺的，他更多面对的是如何走下去的问题，这一次是在旅途中寻找答案，那种漂泊无根感最终又扎根于无血缘家庭关系或者说乌托邦式的“爱”中。既是女性生育之后学着成为母亲，也是所有被抛弃的边缘人群学着接受自己的过程，哎，还是受伤者互相舔舐，怪不得会得天主教人道精神奖……
极其平庸的一部动作喜剧片，不知道为什么会被媒体营销成尼古拉斯凯奇的口碑力作，想靠本片咸鱼翻身还是趁早洗洗睡吧
感觉他们都活得挺好的，一个人活着，一点都不需要救赎。
是凯奇的真实心路历程吧 演技真的没得说 只要不选奇奇怪怪的剧本 就魅力十足
其实是枝裕和本可以选择拍一部：1）血缘家庭；2）类型内部拓展；3）类型外部融合 三条路任选一条，哪怕加一个国外debuff，结果都不会太惨，但最后他选择了非血缘家庭概念拓展并类型融合，而且在海外，四个debuff直接把自己玩儿死了。
温吞水般的节奏，底层，犯罪，临时家庭，感觉就是专门为韩国市场翻拍了一遍《小偷家族》。当然剧本还是很是枝的，该温暖就温暖，该治愈就致郁，每个人物也都有其相应的独特作用。
将所有苦难套上阳光明媚的羽衣是是枝裕和赋予电影的浪漫天真，是否令人不适见仁见智，但呈现出来的性别态度和对堕胎议题的立场就是真切的东亚传统式的保守甚至剥削，“感谢你的降生”是建立在“出生之前就杀死难道不是罪吗”的残酷荒谬基础上。单场戏很细腻但整体却没有重点，执着于对家庭温情的追求从而令每一场戏都奔着“感人至深”这个目的腻死观众，意图先行从来没有好结果。裴斗娜的表演是好的，但把她那条线删一删好像也不影响什么。是一部彻底落入自身窠臼的失败的影片，如果继续创作的话，还是希望导演能够更新一下自己吧。
前三分之二，不，应该是前四分之三都很有意思，但是最后就跟预算不足了一样，一泻千里。当年看到这个case的时候我还很惊喜凯奇终于要接一部旷世奇作了，结果还是有些失望，到底什么时候才能不落俗套的来一部翻身之作啊！
陷入创作惯性的庸常，好像是所有作者型导演无法逃开的绝症，只要一旦染疾，病情就很难好转，更别说痊愈；即使想换个环境调理一下，也是治标不治本的事，这是其一。坚持自己的审美与风格、维护自己的创作习惯，和陷入单一叙事迷恋、沉迷某种创作情怀，不是一回事，这是其二。
回来了，哈哈。凯奇看来必须有一个好的男搭档才能拍出好片子啊
尼古拉斯凯奇的电影总感觉不看后悔，看了更后悔，但我依然一如既往的爱着他，期盼着他能崛起。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
